Email this article 
Paramedic assessment of frailty: An exploratory study of perceptions of frailty assessment tools
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.32378/ijp.v3i1.80
Abstract
Introduction: Frailty is recognised as a significant variable in the health of older adults. Early identification by paramedics of those at risk of frailty may assist in timely entry to an appropriate clinical care pathway. Early referral to such pathways has been shown to improve patient outcomes and quality of life, as well as deliver economic benefits. To date, little research has been completed regarding assessment of frailty by paramedic professionals using validated assessment tools. The objective of this study was to determine paramedicine students’ perceptions of screening tools to facilitate assessment and knowledge of frailty of older adults. The Edmonton Frail Scale (EFS) and the Groningen Frailty Index (GFI) were determined suitable for this purpose.
Methods: The research adopted a mixed methods approach using a survey tool developed to gather both qualitative and quantitative data from students at the completion of a structured aged care clinical placement. Thematic analysis of the qualitative data identified key features of the tools, while a Likert-type scale was used to measure perspectives about the suitability of the tools for use in paramedic practice.
Results: Thirty-seven paramedicine students were invited to participate in the study. Thirteen were able to use both tools to conduct frailty assessments and submitted survey responses. Student perspectives indicated both the EFS and GFI are potentially suitable for paramedicine and as clinical learning tools regarding geriatric assessments. Median time to administer the tools was eight minutes for the EFS and ten minutes for the GFI.
Conclusion: Paramedicine students support a frailty assessment tool to assist clinical decision making regarding older adults. Further appraisal of validated frailty assessment tools by operational paramedics in a pre-hospital environment is warranted to determine absolute utility for Australian paramedics.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Morley JE. Frailty and Sarcopenia: The New Geriatric Giants. Rev Invest Clin. 2016;68(2):59-67.
Chen X, Mao G, Leng SX. Frailty syndrome: an overview. Clin Interv Aging. 2014;9:433-41.
Clegg A, Young J, Iliffe S, Rikkert MO, Rockwood K. Frailty in elderly people. Lancet. 2013;381(9868):752-62.
Lacas A, Rockwood K. Frailty in primary care: a review of its conceptualization and implications for practice. BMC Med. 2012;10.
Gerald A. Meehl a, Claudia Tebaldi a. More Intense, More Frequent, and Longer Lasting Heat Waves in the 21st Century. Science. 2004(5686):994.
Ahmed N, Mandel R, Fain MJ. Frailty: an emerging geriatric syndrome. Am J Med. 2007;120.
Drubbel I, de Wit NJ, Bleijenberg N, Eijkemans RJ, Schuurmans MJ, Numans ME. Prediction of adverse health outcomes in older people using a frailty index based on routine primary care data. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2013;68.
Klein BE, Klein R, Knudtson MD, Lee KE. Frailty, morbidity and survival. Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2005;41(2):141-9.
Song X, Mitnitski A, Rockwood K. Prevalence and 10-year outcomes of frailty in older adults in relation to deficit accumulation. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2010;58.
Goldstein JP, Andrew MK, Travers A. Frailty in Older Adults Using Pre-hospital Care and the Emergency Department: A Narrative Review. Canadian Geriatrics Journal : CGJ. 2012;15(1):16-22.
Schuurmans H, Steverink N, Lindenberg S, Frieswijk N, Slaets JPJ. Old or frail: what tells us more? J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2004;59.
Fried LP, Tangen CM, Walston J, Newman AB, Hirsch C, Gottdiener J, et al. Frailty in older adults: evidence for a phenotype. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2001;56.
Jones DM, Song X, Rockwood K. Operationalizing a frailty index from a standardized comprehensive geriatric assessment. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2004;52.
Cigolle CT, Ofstedal MB, Tian Z, Blaum CS. Comparing models of frailty: the health and retirement study. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2009;57.
Etman A, Burdorf A, Van der Cammen TJM, Mackenbach JP, Van Lenthe FJ. Socio-demographic determinants of worsening in frailty among community-dwelling older people in 11 European countries. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2012;66.
Ensrud KE, Ewing SK, Cawthon PM, Fink HA, Taylor BC, Cauley JA, et al. A comparison of frailty indexes for the prediction of falls, disability, fractures, and mortality in older men. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2009;57(3):492-8.
Kaehr E, Visvanathan R, Malmstrom TK, Morley JE. Frailty in Nursing Homes: The FRAIL-NH Scale. J Am Med Dir Assoc.16(2):87-9.
Juma S, Taabazuing M-M, Montero-Odasso M. Clinical Frailty Scale in an Acute Medicine Unit: a Simple Tool That Predicts Length of Stay. Canadian Geriatrics Journal. 2016;19(2):34-9.
Rockwood K, Song X, MacKnight C, Bergman H, Hogan DB, McDowell I, et al. A global clinical measure of fitness and frailty in elderly people. CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association Journal. 2005;173(5):489-95.
Sternberg SA, Wershof Schwartz A, Karunananthan S, Bergman H, Mark Clarfield A. The identification of frailty: a systematic literature review. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2011;59.
Goldstein J, Hubbard RE, Moorhouse P, Andrew MK, Mitnitski A, Rockwood K. The validation of a care partner-derived frailty index based upon comprehensive geriatric assessment (CP-FI-CGA) in emergency medical services and geriatric ambulatory care. Age Ageing. 2015;44(2):327-30.
Lowthian J, Jolley D, Curtis A, Currell A, Cameron P, Stoelwinder J, et al. The challenges of population ageing: accelerating demand for emergency ambulance services by older patients, 1995-2015. Medical Journal of Australia. 2011;194(11):574.
Lucas P, McCall M, Lea E, Eccleston C, Crisp E, Andrews S, et al. Clinical placements in residential care facilities part 1 : positive experiences. Journal of Paramedic Practice. 2013;5(7):400-6.
Lucas PV, Harris W, Mason R, Annear M, Robinson A, McInerney F, et al. Pain assessment in older adults with dementia: An exploratory pilot study of paramedic students’ perceptions of the utility of two validated assessment tools. Australasian Journal of Paramedicine. 2016;13(3):6p.
Lucas PV, McCall MJ, Eccleston C, Lea E, Stratton B, Annear M, et al. Prioritising the development of paramedic students' interpersonal skills. Journal of Paramedic Practice. 2015;7(5):242-8.
Rolfson DB, Majumdar SR, Tsuyuki RT, Tahir A, Rockwood K. Validity and reliability of the Edmonton Frail Scale. Age Ageing. 2006;35(5):526-9.
Peters LL, Boter H, Buskens E, Slaets JPJ. Measurement properties of the groningen frailty indicator in home-dwelling and institutionalized elderly people. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2012;13.
Drubbel I, Bleijenberg N, Kranenburg G, Eijkemans RJC, Schuurmans MJ, de Wit NJ, et al. Identifying frailty: do the Frailty Index and Groningen Frailty Indicator cover different clinical perspectives? a cross-sectional study. BMC Family Practice. 2013;14:64-.
Annear M, Walker K, Lucas P, Lo A, Robinson A. Interprofessional education in aged-care facilities: Tensions and opportunities among undergraduate health student cohorts. Journal of Interprofessional Care. 2016;30(5):627-35.
Productivity Commission, Housing decisions of older Australians. Canberra; 2015.
Lucas P, McCall M, Lea E, Eccleston C, Stratton B, Crisp E, et al. Clinical placements in residential care facilities part 2: negative experiences. Journal of Paramedic Practice. 2013;5(8):462-8.
Thompson J, Drummond C. Exploring paramedic patient assessment. Journal of Paramedic Practice. 2013;5(6):342-7.
El-Masri S, Saddik B. An emergency system to improve ambulance dispatching, ambulance diversion and clinical handover communication-a proposed model. J Med Syst. 2012;36(6):3917-
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.32378/ijp.v3i1.80
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2018 Wayne Harris, Peter Vincent Lucas, Helen Eyles, Leigh Parker
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
IJP is an Open Access journal and articles published are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) licence. Article copyright remains with individual authors. Authors grant unrestricted copyright license to the IJP. Readers may copy, distribute, build upon, reproduce, and display the work with the proper citation of the original work in this publication.
DPLA Rights statement:http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC-NC/1.0/?language=en. The IJP supports the National Principles for Open Access Policy Statement.